Friday, March 16, 2007

UWM STUDY ATTACKS BARRETT'S "CLUELESSNESS" ON JOBS CRISIS

“Civic leadership in Milwaukee, we contend, continues to lack the vision, policies, and institutions to comprehensively attack and meaningfully alleviate the crisis of race and jobs in the city and region” – Marc V. Levine


By Michael Horne



Professor Marc V. Levine of UWM has issued a scathing criticism of the employment situation for black males in Milwaukee, saying Mayor Barrett’s comments on the crisis show “a troubling sign of cluelessness about the true nature of the jobs crisis in Milwaukee.”


The crisis “goes beyond the ameliorative capacity of “branding strategies” or the new regional image sought by the mayor and the M-7 leadership,” he writes in “Crisis of Black Male Joblessness in Milwaukee: Trends, Explanations and Policy Options” [University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Center for Economic Development, March 2007.]


Levine has harsh words for Barrett’s plan to take over job training from the Private Industry Council of Milwaukee County, saying “Barrett’s workforce development plan appears no different than the “training-is-the-answer” initiatives that have preceded it. All have promised to be “employer-driven,” streamlined, and coordinated; thus, these intentions hardly mark the Barrett plan as a new departure. Yet, the earlier training initiatives have all fallen short in alleviating Milwaukee’s employment crisis.”


The problem with the mayor’s vision, as well as with all job training programs he has studied over 40 years, Levine says, is that it is fundamentally flawed.


“Workforce development is predicated on the fallacious assumptions that enough jobs exist for properly trained workers, or that with adequate training enough private-sector jobs will materialize for all workers. In fact, in 2005, by conservative estimate, there were 88,294 more jobless than available jobs in metro Milwaukee; there were six jobless Milwaukeeans for every available job in 2005; there were an astounding nine jobless for every available full-time job. The primary need in Milwaukee is not improved job training, but rather policies that increase the demand for low- to moderate-skilled labor and attack the critical shortage of available jobs in the region.” [Emphasis original.]


The situation in Milwaukee is particularly troubling because of three factors:


· De-industrialization has removed the jobs that were once available for entry-level and lower-skilled labor;


· Suburbanization of jobs has moved employment from where 91% of the black workforce lives;


· Hypersegregation has made Milwaukee the only city where there are no industrialized suburbs with any appreciable black population.


The litany of disasters goes on, impeccably researched by Levine, as usual. Since 1980 all net job growth has been in the suburbs; 41 per cent of white workers are employed in exurban counties, and only 11 per cent of blacks …


As for the M-7, the regional cooperation agency, well don’t get Levine started:


“So far, the M-7 seems focused on branding and marketing Milwaukee and pursuing what one researcher has dubbed the ‘job training charade,’ rather than the kinds of meaningful regional “equity” polices in transportation, public finance and housing that could make a difference in combating minority joblessness.”


The solution: Levine says government spending on infrastructure with employment goals such as we have for the Marquette Interchange project and the City Hall restoration project would be key.


Specifically “this study recommends that Milwaukee leaders vigorously pursue development of a jobs-producing, competitiveness-enhancing regional light rail transit system. In its political resistance to light rail, Milwaukee is increasingly isolated among U.S. cities; and, the more Milwaukee remains immobilized on this issue, the more the region risks falling further behind our competitors economically, and the more we lose the opportunity for a “big bang” investment that could ameliorate the labor market for low- to moderate-skilled workers.


For the private initiatives, Levine recommends housing construction, particularly near employment centers.


A critical element of a jobs strategy in Milwaukee must involve opening up the suburban labor markets of the region to racial diversity. “Opening up the suburbs” might include several policy options, but the two most important are transportation and housing.


· Regional transportation policies must be realigned to facilitate the access of central city workers to suburban employment centers;


· Affordable housing in the suburbs is essential, so that low- to –moderate-skilled workers, with limited incomes, can live in greater proximity to the location of 90 percent of the region’s entry-level job openings.


I think Levine is absolutely right, and would welcome your dissenting comments, particularly on the subject of transportation. If we can’t run a simple bus up N. Port Washington Road in Mequon where entry-level jobs go begging by the hundreds just miles from the central city, then we have no right to complain that unemployed black males are threatening our precious domestic tranquility milling about on the streets where they live, where there also used to be work.


[Update: March 20th, 2007 -- In the comments section, you will find a letter from Dr. Levine regarding this post, and his characterization of the coverage if it in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel . He was none too pleased that the daily paper’s headline boasted how black unemployment had seen a rare decline in Milwaukee between 2000 [47.3%] and 2005 [44.1%], which is still a prodigiously high number, yet ignored the substantive portions of his report, especially the parts about transportation, jobs and housing accessibility in the suburbs, malheureusement!—Michael Horne]


Black Crisis report link.


3 Comments:

At 11:06 AM, Anonymous AngieB said...

While I agree that the Barrett/Milwaukee 7 focus on 'branding' is a short-term loser, long-term this strategy could attract the attention of businesses, especially large employers, to the city. Of course, the likelihood of an industry that would have lots of low skill, entry-level jobs available coming here is pretty low (not sure there is such a thing in the US anymore!); it's certainly worth pursuing, but also certainly not the most realistic remedy.
The real problem is 1)getting workers to jobs where they currently exist, then 2)getting them hired, then 3)getting them to stay on the job. Some employers in outlying areas (Quadgraphics) actually have busses to pick up workers, I understand. Maybe funding could go to helping establish vans or bus servie to other businesses that are willing to hire city residents. It might make sense for the state to invest in a car loan program of some sort, too. (I can see the liability issues already!)
The other points are much more difficult, and those are the areas job training programs were presumably meant to address; unfortunately, after 40 years and millions of tax dollars, they seem to have failed to a great extent. The fact is that a culture exists (Milwaukee writer Kevin Walker calls it Culture of Poverty)that does not foster punctuality, responsibility or persistence in meeting a (longterm) goal. The abscence of those qualities does not make for a desirable employee.
No amount of funding, no 'program' or 'initiative' will reform a culture like this.
And of course, that doesn't even touch on the MPS/education issue, which is both symptom and partial cause of the 'culture' problem.
In a way, I don't blame Barrett et al for choosing the easy, showy approach of 'branding'.

 
At 11:42 AM, Blogger Michael Horne said...

Dear Readers --

I received this letter from Prof. Levine:

Michael,

Just had a look at your commentary on my latest study -- thanks, and well done.
You certainly captured the heart of my argument much more accurately than the
JS coverage. Thanks,

Marc Levine

 
At 3:47 PM, Anonymous DK said...

I would say the problem with this view is the practical implementation. Suburbanites in Mequon may denounce inner-city crime, but socially and economically speaking, I doubt many see it as their problem. Fewer still will be enthused about opening up Da 'Quon to inner city labor. It would take a lot of principle, motivation, fortitude, and political capital for a leader to push this issue with any hope of success. And Mayor Barrett? When there was support for the Milwaukee Connector, he was with County Supervisor Scott Walker in tanking it.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

>
follow me on Twitter
Michael Horne's Profile
Michael Horne's Facebook Profile
Create Your Badge