Monday, February 26, 2007

ELECTION COMMISSION TO RECERTIFY MUNI COURT VOTE TODAY; NORMAN TO ANNOUNCE RECOUNT PLANS

UPDATE -- February 26th, 2007, 4:30 p.m. Attorney Michael S. Maistelman, representing Jeffrey B. Norman, said his client has filed for a recount of the results of the election of February 20th. The paperwork and the accompanying check were presented to the Election Commission late this afternoon following a meeting of the commission in which Norman complained of practices at the polls on election day. Commission staff said some of the problems were due to the Norman campaign's instructions to voters on how to cast an absentee ballot for Norman using a sticker supplied by the campaign.
The board also recertified its canvass of last Wednesday. Interestingly, although mootly, the recertification would have granted Norman until Thursday to file his request for a recount. The deadline originally was today. This information was from Executive Director Sue Edman, and was confirmed by George Dunst, counsel to the State of Wisconsin Elections Board. However, the Norman campaign spared the electorate this additional matter of suspense.
The campaign sent a check for $2,979.29 to cover the costs of the staff for an eight-hour day. A $350 fee for a court reporter is included in the amount. In his recall request, Norman cited, "mistakes, fraud an other irregularities in each and every Ward of the city."
-- Michael Horne


Jeffrey Norman
hired Attorney Michael Maistelman last week in his bid to bump Phil Chavez off the ballot for municipal judge. Maistelman wasted no time in arranging for a recertification of the results of the February 20th primary election in which Norman ran a well-organized write-in effort that he thinks was sufficient to gain him the number two spot on the general election ballot. The recertification, and a discussion of a possible recount request by Norman are on the agenda.
Maistelman said in a press release that the "prior certification by [the] commission erroneously failed to include potentially hundreds of write-in votes for Jeffrey Norman." [See earlier milwaukeeworld postings for more.]
The meeting will be held in the commission offices at room 501 City Hall, 200 E. Wells St. at 10:30 a.m. In addition to the recertification, Norman will announce his plans regarding a possible recount. There will also be an opportunity for public comment.
Commission Assistant Director Neil Albrecht said Monday that the recertification involves 59 write-in votes that were discovered for Norman after the election. These votes brought his total to 3,023, as reported here last week, and not the 2,964 votes reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Although Maistelman, who could not immediately be reached for comment, stopped short of saying his candidate would demand a recount, the commission has provided him with the needed information should he proceed to do so, including costs, Albrecht said.
The costs would run to $3,000 per 8-hour day, he said. Could the recount be completed in a day? Possibly not, since a write-in recount would be "more labor intensive," he said, and "may encounter challenges" by opponents as the count ensues.
Meanwhile, front-runner Jennifer Havas was on the campaign trail Friday, appearing at Garfield's 502 for a live broadcast of the Eric Von Show. Norman also popped in to the club, celebrating its first anniversary at the location of the former Boobie's Place, 502 E. Garfield Ave. Antonio Riley was also there, looking quite mayoral.
-- Michael Horne

7 Comments:

At 4:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A recount would be an embarassment to Norman. He lost, he screwed up his own election chances by not following the basic procedures that all 5 other candidates did. It's going to cost him $3,000 per day and will produce nothing...unless he's trying to draw this out far enough so that he can run AGAIN on April 3rd as a write-in candidate.

 
At 4:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I find it funny how despite mentioned Phil Chavez and his campaign countless times in multiple articles since last Tuesday, Michael Horne has yet to contact the campaign for their reaction. If he did in fact contact them and they had no comment, that should be printed. So much for journalism I guess.

 
At 4:57 PM, Blogger Michael Horne said...

I did too contact the Chavez campaign before I got this note + you will note I have not written anything about Chavez since the election, so it's not like I'm talking behind his back. I have received much unsolicited information from other candidates. I have not received a "no comment" or any other comment from the Chavez campaign, and if you are involved with it, as it sounds like you are, then send me something! You don't need my invitation for that! I spoke to Chavez when I first heard that Norman wasn't going to be on the ballot -- broke the news, in fact.
Furthermore, the Chavez telephone number is a Long Distance number, and I cannot spend all of my money on toll calls. Folks -- this is a volunteer operation! I don't charge you for this, and you don't see any ads here, do you? And nobody's paying me for my time! I can't spend all day contacting judges and those who would like to be judges. If you have something, Anonymous, then send it on -- or ask the candidate to do so. You anonymous people are so prickly.
Horne

 
At 11:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's funny because when I went to Chavez's website I noticed that ALL phone numbers listed were local (414) numbers. Why would any candidate list a long distance phone number for a city-wide race?!?! And no, I don't work for the campaign, just an interested voter.

 
At 12:19 PM, Blogger Michael Horne said...

I am really being taken to task about that long distance telephone number! I really must watch where I source my telephone numbers, and I should have first looked at the campaign site for that information. I know where I got it, though, and that was from Chavez' listing with the state bar.

 
At 3:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mike, you really have no reason to apologize. People should expect confusion when someone simply moves here from Mt. Horeb to run for an open elected office. In the past, people had a term for such folks: carpetbagger!

 
At 3:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, it's REALLY tough to go to a candidate's campaign site to find a contact phone number. I guess we shouldn't expect that type of effort.

The same carpetbagger term could be affixed to Havas considering she recently moved to Miwaukee, is not originally from here, and has never had experience as a judge.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

>
    follow me on Twitter
    Michael Horne's Profile
    Michael Horne's Facebook Profile
    Create Your Badge