UNLICENSED CORPORATION LAWYERS FOUND
[[Update -- November 10th, 2006 This story continues to have resonance, and is a much-visited spot here at milwaukeeworld.com. It is the first to mention that the General Counsel for Baird lacks a Wisconsin license. This may have some impact on the dispute between Robert W. Baird & Co. and Red Granite Advisors, LLC., which is mentioned elsewhere on this site. Today's Wall Street Journal, in an article entitled "The Breakup: When Brokerage Houses Attack," by staff reporter Susanne Craig, mentioned "the firm's in-house lawyer," who remained unnamed in the story, but could very likely be Glenn F. Hackmann, mentioned below. -- Michael Horne]]
BAR NONE: SOME
Oshkosh Truck Corp. -- Briggs & Stratton Corp. -- Sensient Technologies, Corp. -- -- Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc. on list
By
It would be any CEO’s nightmare: Your General Counsel, entrusted with the in-house legal department of your firm, tells you that you never really had a legal attorney-client privilege agreement, and every negotiation you’ve undertaken must therefore be revealed to your adversaries, who could hold you in contempt. Your attorney could face sanctions for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, and disqualification all because he or she, for whatever reason, never got a Wisconsin license despite working for years from a Wisconsin office. A far fetched scenario? Hardly, according to a Milwaukeeworld.com investigation.
Among
The issue is ripe, and the consequences for Wisconsin-based corporations whose in-house counsel might lack
According to John K. Villa, author of Corporate Counsel Guidelines, “The multi-jurisdictional nature of corporate law practice raises difficult and largely unanswered questions about whether the corporate counsel is engaging in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) if [he or] she fails to be licensed in every jurisdiction [his or] her activity affects.
Villa heavily cites a study that appeared in the Marquette Law Review by Daniel A. Vigil, Regulating In
Villa cites a conclusion of Vigil's study, "... general counsel in the hypothetical might well be considered to be engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.7" [The footnote specifically mentions Wisconsin, among other states. -- Ed.]
“Even if corporate counsel is unlikely to face sanctions for the unauthorized practice of law, his [or her] conduct could still potentially harm his [or her] corporate employer,” Villa writes.
Villa gives as an example a corporation employing a corporate counsel who is unlicensed in the state where he will practice.
“Under those circumstances, the corporation may risk that its communications with counsel will be unprotected by that state’s attorney-client privilege law.”
If an adversary in litigation discovered his opponent to be unlicensed in the state in which his firm does business, Villa warns, the adversary could seek “disqualification, a contempt citation or an order requiring counsel to associate … with a local lawyer for the duration of the case.”
IMPACT ON STATE COMPANIES
With such high stakes, it is confounding that attorneys who make a career of practicing in
Take, for example, military contractor Oshkosh Truck Corp. On October 16th 2006 it announced a $3 billion purchase of JLG Industries, Inc. According to the
I called
Likewise, I called John L. Hammond, who has been the Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of Milwaukee-based Sensient Corporation since 1998, where he makes $417,000 per year. He claims to be licensed in
At least W. David Romoser, the Vice President , General Counsel and Secretary of A.O. Smith Corp. since 1992 admits that he is not “admitted in Wisconsin,” although you might wonder why not. In any event, his
Robert F. Heath has been the counsel for Briggs & Stratton Corp. since 1997, but he is nowhere to be found among
Neither is Glen F. Hackmann, the Managing Director, General counsel and Secretary of Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc., a highly-regulated privately-owned financial services company based in
