NAN'S CAMS ON WAY
Chief Requests Information on Surveillance System
Chief Nannette Hegerty of the Milwaukee Police Department has issued a “Request for Information Wired and Wireless Camera Surveillance System” to deploy “at least 25-30 cameras … in at least four areas of the city and with at least one monitoring station.”
The system “is to be installed and operational during the summer of 2006.” The request for information is not an invitation to bid, the chief advises, adding, “however, the Department desires information on cost in order to plan an effective deployment of as many cameras as possible in the future.”
The cameras are to utilize a web interface, “so as not to require the deployment of software to individual computer workstations used to monitor the cameras in the system.”
Furthermore, the “system should feature hardened/bullet resistant enclosures for the camera and/or associated equipment. The enclosure shall accommodate a 19” tall by 15” wide Milwaukee Police Decal,” just so you know Big Sister is watching.
In the event the road map-sized decal should not be sufficiently conspicuous, the “enclosure shall also accommodate a strobe light mounted in such a manner as to be seen from all directions and of sufficient intensity to attract attention to the presence of the camera.” Wouldn’t you like to have that flashing outside your bedroom window all night!
The zoom feature of the camera should be “capable of viewing vehicle license plates at a distance of about 600 feet (one city block).”
It is also expected that those systems not connected directly to wired infrastructure will utilize the city-wide Wi-Fi network currently under construction by Midwest Fiber Networks.
The system chosen “must make provision for the storage of all captured images for a period of 15 calendar days after which time the images are automatically deleted and/or overwritten unless specifically saved by an operator.”
Does this sound like your kind of thing?
If so, “the city invites responders to submit sample camera for use by the City of Milwaukee as test equipment in the pilot areas of the city in summer of 2006. The city will not pay for the sample goods submitted by responders but will return the equipment, if required to do so, once the type of equipment needed by the city is determined and purchased.”
Responses are appreciated by May 19th 2006.
--Michael Horne
IN OTHER NEWS
Tim McMurtry II, former aide to Common Council President Willie Hines Jr. began work Monday, April 24th at Mueller Communications, Inc. where he will work with staff on client accounts, the firm confirmed this morning. … If you own a property in the City of Milwaukee, or if you are just curious about a property’s new assessment numbers, you can try to log onto the city’s website to look it up. New numbers were posted today. … What is the motivation behind the constitutional amendment prohibiting gay marriage? According to a Republican, who said this with a straight face, “it has always been about domestic partner insurance benefits.” And what is the problem with domestic partner benefits? “They could bankrupt the state and private businesses. Especially if the partners are women,” who consume a majority of health care dollars after a certain age. (Presumably after the age that most men drop dead.) So, you see – it has nothing to do about being anti-gay, per se!
Perhaps, if we want to make republicans happy, we should hire a team of actuaries to rewrite our constitution. What a bunch of hooey!
--Michael Horne
ASSEMBLY ACTS ON TAX BREAK FOR SEASON TICKET HOLDERS
--But Action Not Yet Revealed to Public
On April 12th 2006 “executive action was taken” by the legislature on 2005 Assembly Bill 1084. However, not even the experts at the Legislative Reference Bureau in Madison will know what action was taken until further reports are made by the Committee on Ways and Means. And, apparently the committee can take its good-natured time doing so.
The bill would create a non-refundable income and franchise tax credit “in the amount of the state sales or use tax paid on purchases of ‘rights to purchase’ season admissions to athletic events sponsored by certain institutions of higher education that take place at a facility owned or leased by the institution. Unused credits could be carried forward 15 years.”
The fiscal estimate narrative for the bill tells us that a right “to purchase a season ticket costs $100 - $250 for football, $50 - $150 for men’s basketball, $25 for women’s basketball and $25-$50 for men’s hockey” at the University of Wisconsin. According to the UW figures provided to the bureau, “sales of rights total $6.1 million annually.” State taxes on these rights total about $300,000, according to staff estimates. Assuming all eligible purchasers tax advantage of this tax break, it would cost the state treasury that sum annually if the bill, sponsored by Rep. Sheryl K. Albers, (R-49th) and Rep. Phil Montgomery, (R-4th). Albers is a 2004 graduate of the UW law school; Montgomery has a B.S. from the University of Houston-Downtown.
The proposal does not sit well with Rep. David A. Cullen, (D-13th), a UW graduate who wrote to a constituent to say, “This bill is not a joke. … I do not support a tax break for purchases of season tickets … I believe people purchasing season tickets for such events purchase the tickets having the means of doing so and the sales tax on the tickets have not prevented them from doing so. There is no reason to give a tax break to people of such means when we are cutting funding for many other worthy programs … not the least of which are the institutions of higher learning themselves.”
According to Cullen’s information, the bill was introduced on March 2nd 2006, and was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means that same day. It had a public hearing on April 4th.
Now – if the assembly would only release the action it took on the bill on Wednesday, April 12th!
--Michael Horne