Dear Reader,
Mark Sostarich wants his law license back, after his conviction for sending kickbacks to former Sen. Gary George. Alan Eisenberg tried hard to get his back, and it does not look like his chances are too good, judging from the report sent by the referee to the Supreme Court. If Paul Henningsen wants his license back, he'll have to apply to do so, also. Below you will find an update on the situations of these once noble practicioners of the bar.
Also, we take a tour of the Diplomatic Reception Rooms of the State Department in Washington, D.C., and tell you why a famous Milwaukee furniture collector refused to donate any items to this important collection. We also hear from the Milwaukee Public Schools about plans to raze the former Boys' Tech school building.
Thanks for reading, and do let me hear from you,
Michael Horne
Editor / Publisher
horne@milwaukeeworld.com
1 414 978-8039
Also, subscribe using that little button off to the right. Tell me if you have any problems getting through; you should receive my postings automatically.
Horne
SOSTARICH WANTS LAW LICENSE BACK
Better get your holiday shopping done early, since you'll want to set aside December 21st 2005 to attend a public hearing when Mark A. Sostarich will petition for reinstatement of his license to practice law.
Sostarich's license was suspended by the Wisconsin Supreme Court for 18 months, effective May 18, 2004, upon his conviction of one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud, a federal crime. A former leader of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, Sostarich offered kickbacks of certain legal fees to then-Sen. Gary A. George, who is currently in prison. The kickbacks were from legal work Sostarich did for the now-defunct Opportunities Industrialization Commission (OIC).
For those of you with a law library, a detailed description of Sostarich's misconduct can be found in
Disciplinary Proceedings Against Sostarich 2005 WI 97, 698 N.W.2d (2005).
Any interested person may appear at the hearing and be heard in support of, or in opposition to, the petition for reinstatement.
Certainly there must be a few Republicans in this city who might care to participate in this exercise in democracy which will be held at the law offices of Halling & Cayo, 320 East Buffalo St. #700 at 9 a.m. before Referee Kim Peterson. - Michael Horne
HENNINGSEN COULD GET LICENSE BY MARCH
Former Alderman Paul Henningsen attended the Friday opening of the Milwaukee Public Market Friday, October 14th in the company of his wife, Margaret Henningsen of Legacy Bank. Henningsen was trim, with a neat beard and was wearing a conservative suit of good cut. He was not bejeweled, as he had been at times during his aldermanic career, which ended behind bars in a Federal Prison on four counts of mail fraud. Yes, the glittering ear stud is no more.
Henningsen's license to practice law was suspended by the Wisconsin Supreme Court on August 24, 2004 for a period of two years, retroactive to March 2, 2004.
If he would like to regain his license, he may petition the Supreme Court beginning December 3rd 2005. He must then go through a process involving a referee and a public hearing. The referee will make a decision in the case, should Henningsen pursue reinstatement. The decision is not binding upon the Supreme Court, which makes the final decision. - Michael Horne
PROSPECTS DIM FOR EISENBERG REINSTATEMENT
Last July hearings were held in Milwaukee before Referee Richard M. Esenberg in the matter of the Petition for Reinstatement of Alan D. Eisenberg to practice law.
On September 6th 2005, Esenberg filed a 36-page report with the Clerk of the Supreme Court recommending denial of Eisenberg's petition.
He recommended in the event the Supreme Court were to reinstate the license of the oft-disciplined Milwaukeean, that Eisenberg should contribute monies to a fund for client protection (against lawyers like Eisenberg), and that he turn $11,000 to a State Trust Account.
The referee's decision is not final; it is an advisory that goes to the Supreme Court, which can take its good-natured time making a decision in the matter. Eisenberg has filed a response with the court in opposition to Esenberg's findings, according to Bill Weigel, Litigation Counsel for the Office of Lawyer Regulation. - Michael Horne
THE DIPLOMATIC RECEPTION ROOMS
Last Tuesday, October 11th 2005, I was among 12 people to take the 10:30 a.m. tour of the Diplomatic Reception Rooms on the eighth floor of the United States Department of State. The rooms, named for Secretaries of State who became President, along with a room named for Benjamin Franklin, considered the "Father of the American Foreign Service," contain museum quality pieces culled from a variety of sources since its conception in 1961.
Virtually all of the items in the collection date to the period of 1750 - 1825, and were made in America.
For the most part, the collection was built with the tax-deductible donations of furniture and cash from public citizens, foundations and corporations all of which succumbed to the genteel arm twisting of Clement Conger, who went on to curate the White House collection of furniture, which is somewhat less distinguished, thank you.
Antiquarians will recognize the names of the makers of some of the furniture and decorative arts pieces- Goddard-Townsend, Paul Revere, Gilbert Stuart, Jean-Antoine Houdon, Simon Willard, and others.
During this period American furniture reached its apex, freed, like the country itself, from the restraints of Georgian England. The diplomatic reception room holds a Frothingham Bombe chest dating to 1753, the first example of that swollen-fronted, French-inspired style to be made in the United States.
A Thomas Harland tall case clock from Norwich, Connecticut, 1776 is cherry - not mahogany, as a British clock of the era might be - and is in absolute perfect working order.
A Goddard-Townsend Newport shell and block chest of drawers is particularly sublime, and one would find its equal in only a few museums in the world -- including the Milwaukee Art Museum, F.Y.I.
A copy of the Treaty of Paris rests upon the actual desk upon which it was signed; a Gilbert Stuart portrait of George Washington looks on, benignly.
Rembrandt Peale is represented with matching paintings of George and Martha Washington. In a cabinet not far away is a wine cooler that George Washington gave to Timothy Pickering. Items from George and Martha's personal china collection are in the room, along with several pieces of the famous Society of the Cincinnati china. (Milwaukee has a plate from that collection, too.)
Thomas Jefferson's china is in the room, and a clock with Benjamin Franklin's likeness adorns a table top. The clock is likely French, but the omnipresent guards would not let me get close enough to tell. A breakfront has drawer pulls with stamped eagles and the words "peace" on them. This is quite a rarity, since most brass furniture pulls of the era were imported from England, and were not known for their patriotic American motifs.
As the brochure to the collection states, "The Diplomatic Reception Rooms are among the most beautiful rooms in the world used for official entertaining," and it was with some surprise that I discovered they were open to the public.
Interestingly, the great museums of Washington D.C., including the National Galleryof Art and the Smithsonian Institution are quite sparse in their holdings of 18th century American Decorative Arts, although there are a number of excellent private collections in the area open to the public operated by outfits like the Colonial Dames and the Daughters of the American Revolution, so this collection is a special treat.
As readers of milwaukeeworld.com know, Milwaukee is home to a superlative collection of 18th century American Decorative Arts in the Chipstone Foundation, which has graciously deigned to allow a few scraps from its accumulation to be piled up in an exhibition space in the basement of the Milwaukee Art Museum that hasn't changed since the jumble was dumped there in 2001. We are to be grateful to the trustees of the foundation for sharing some of the pieces they have decided not to sell for a million dollars apiece as they did four times already this year as if they need the money. Grrrr!
Collection founder Stanley Stone was no fan of the Diplomatic Reception Rooms of the Department of State, or of the public in general, as the actions of his trustees have shown.
At a February, 1980 dinner party in Williamsburg, Virginia, Stone said, "I don't like the idea of gathering all those priceless things together where they might be damaged by the public. … I can't bear to think of somebody putting down a lighted cigarette on a priceless antique chest."
Stone refused to give anything to the State Department collection, although he condescended to give an item to the White House collection. (At last check, it is in storage. Ha! Ha!)
Although the State Department suggests making arrangements for tours of the collection four weeks to three months in advance, I got in on about a week's notice. My mother, who also was recently in Washington, D.C. called last Thursday and visited yesterday.
Put the State Department tour on your next itinerary to Washington, and visit what you can find of the Chipstone Collection here in Milwaukee any time you feel, before the trustees sell the whole thing off, a million bucks at a time. -Michael Horne
READERS' CORNER
[Stephen F. Thiel, a regular reader of milwaukeeworld, had some questions about the impending demolition of the old Tech High School. He thinks it could be repurposed. Instead, it is to be demolished.
Milwaukeeworld shared Mr. Thiel's concerns with Roseann St. Aubin, the director of communications of the Milwaukee Public School System, and she gave the district's reasoning behind the plans for demolition. -Ed.]
Dear Mr. Horne,
I can not believe the institutional insanity present in our government leaders. Only they would look on the pending demolition of the old Tech High School with eagerness. This building, built in 1912, has been the alma mater to thousands of graduates, has been the door to the middle-class for thousands through its emphasis on the skilled trades, symbolizes the entire timeline of the 20th Century Milwaukee Industrial Revolution, is still structurally sound, and can be recreated as useful/productive space.
Look at the Kenilworth Building, the Kunzelmann-Esser building, the Ambassador Hotel, the Schuster's store on 12th and Vliet, the Teweles Seed building, and others for adaptive redevelopment. This building is being torn down for what? A playfield! There are literally hundreds of thousands of square feet in this building and it is a crying shame that we can not find the collective creativity/intelligence to re-use this building. There will never be any cheaper square footage than in this building. At a time when the Barrett administration is creatively working to establish business parks at Wood, the Menomonee River valley, RiverWorks, among others, it is inexplicable why they would not save this building.
This building represents Milwaukee as the"Machine Shop to the World", can be a youthful/hip business incubator and entrepreneurial center, can anchor the redelopment of the Fifth Ward, and a huge foundation for the remarkable urban renaissance in Milwaukee.
If Weas Development can succeed with the Kenilworth Building, if Gorman Development can succeed with the Kunzelmann-Esser Building, if Weigand Enterprises can succeed with the Ambassador Hotel, surely a massive redevelopment of the old Boy's Tech High School can succeed. Let's use this grand building to help build a new Milwaukee Industrial Revolution. It is not that hard. Surely the Boy's Tech building is more significant than 100 E. Seeboth or the Peck Row Houses, buildings that received protection from the wrecking ball.
Sure Mrs. Pettit would find it ironic that the very facility that produced thousands of skilled workers for her family's business would now be facing its very own destruction. No one could have foreseen the rapid redevelopment of these neighborhoods. This act of demolition is not unlike the "urban renewal" activities of the 1950's and 1960's and I know we will regret our ill-advised actions.
I just thought you would like to know.
Your loyal reader,
Stephen F. Thiel
A Reply from Roseann St. Aubin
Mr. Horne -
Thank you for bringing your reader's question to our attention.
The decision for demolition of the former Boys' Technical High School was made by three entities. These entities are the Bradley Tech Commission, the School Board and the City of Milwaukee. The Commission itself is made up of representatives of labor, business, the community, parents, MPS, MATC and UWM. There was a great deal of discussion prior to the decision being made.
Currently, the new Bradley Tech has no athletic space. The cost of transporting student athletes to other facilities for practice/play is estimated by the Bradley Tech principal at approximately $180,000 a year. Once the athletic field/green space is completed, which is projected for September of 2006, the space will be used not only by Bradley Tech, but also by MPS' Vieau School, a bilingual K-8 that is located just a couple of blocks away.
Roseann St. Aubin
Director, Communications and Public Affairs
Milwaukee Public Schools
P.O. Box 2181
Milwaukee, WI 53201-2181
Office 414.475.8237
Fax 414.475.8430
staubir@mail.milwaukee.k12.wi.us